Tuesday, December 24, 2019

Causes Of The Civil War - 500 Words

Causes Of The Civil War Let me tell you what is coming. After the sacrifice of countless millions of treasure and hundreds of thousands of lives you may win Southern independence, but I doubt it. The North is determined to preserve this Union. They are not a fiery, impulsive people as you are, for they live in colder climates. But when they begin to move in a given direction, they move with the steady momentum and perseverance of a mighty avalanche, -Gov. Sam Houston-Texas (Speaking as Civil War becomes near). Economic Differences and Political differences are two of the things that were a cause of the Civil War. re many different causes of the Civil War, but the ones that had the biggest impact was Slavery, other political events/†¦show more content†¦This only helped widened the division between North and South. Over time, the abolitionists grew more blatant in their demands, and slave owners dug in, in response, which helped fuel regional tension that ultimately led to the American Civil War. T he reason the civil war started was because of the disagreement of slavery, and also the economical, and other political differences, between the North and the South. There were many different battles in the Civil War, where 620,000 people died. The number of people that died in this war is many more than any of the other wars. The weapons used in the Civil War played a big role by indicating the battles in the Civil War. The two armies in this war were the Union and The Confederate. The Union/ the North was against slavery and believed it was wrong. The Confederates/ the South was for slavery, because it was there way of life. The disagreements between their beliefs, and if it wasn’t for their disagreements then all of the people that died in this war would have lived. Slavery, other political differences, and economical differences between the North and South were a major cause of the Civil War. These things caused the division of the our country. The Civil War was the onl y hope for the fighting between the North and South and for our Country to become one nation once again. The last event that stopped the Civil War, was a meetingShow MoreRelatedThe Causes Of The Civil War1016 Words   |  5 Pages In 1861, a Civil War broke out in the United States when the South declared their independence from the Union.  There is a great amount of reasons that people can argue how the Civil War was started. However, what most people don’t understand, is that most of the events leading up to the Civil War were related to slavery.  Slavery was the core of the North and South’s conflict, which led to a very vicious feud.   The immediate cause of the war was slavery. Southern states, including the 11 statesRead MoreCauses of the Civil War951 Words   |  4 PagesCAUSE OF THE CIVIL WAR In 1860, the world s greatest nation was locked in Civil War. The war divided the country between the North and South. There were many factors that caused this war, but the main ones were the different interpretations of the Constitution by the North and South, the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and the arrival of Lincoln in office. These factors were very crucial in the bringing upon of the destruction of the Union. They caused immediate war. In 1791, the tenth amendment wasRead MoreThe Causes Of The Civil War1409 Words   |  6 PagesThe causes of the Civil War were complex and have been controversial since the country began. Some causes include; states’ rights, economics, and slavery. The most recognizable and popular cause is slavery. The freeing of the slaves was an important moral issue at the time and one of the greatest causes of the civil war. It was only by carefully avoiding the moral issue involved in slavery that Northerners and Southerners could meet on any common ground. (Goldston, 79). The time came in which ourRead MoreThe Cause of the Civil War800 Words   |  4 Pages The Cause of the Civil War Generally, it is thought to be the South’s fault for causing the Civil War. Contrary to popular belief, the Civil War was mainly provoked by the North; through using the federal government to overtake the South, removing slavery which would destroy Southern economy, and creating the moral issue of slavery. The North was the primary reason for the start of a war that ripped our country apart. The North had full control over the federal government and used that to suppressRead MoreCivil War Causes1382 Words   |  6 Pages Causes of the Civil War John Brown’s Raid vs. Industrial Revolution John Brown’s Raid was a more influential cause to the civil war than the Industrial Revolution. The Industrial Revolution caused incompability between the North and the South. The North relied on wage laborers with the new machine age economy while the South relied heavily on slaves. So, the North did not need slaves for their economyRead MoreCauses Of The Civil War1740 Words   |  7 PagesThe Civil War was not an event that erupted overnight or something that no one had seen coming. It was a result of long stemming conflicts. â€Å"The road to civil war was complex and multi-faceted† (Wells, 1). These conflicts kept creating a divide amongst the states in the nation. The divide finally became so great, that the United States split into the Confederacy (South) and the Union (North), and fighting erupted. â€Å" â€Å"The Civil War,† Randall Jimerson observes, â€Å"became a total war involving the entireRead MoreThe Causes Of The Civil War1238 Words   |à ‚  5 PagesGalindo Mr. Scheet AP U.S History 5 November 2017 Unit 4 Essay The initial causes of the Civil War have been previously discussed and analyzed by historians, but have remained one of the most controversial debates, due to its numerous causes that created the most devastating war in American history. The country had been avoiding the disputes that would later become the causes of the civil war for decades. The Mexican War is proof that the issue of slavery was put on hold by President James K. PolkRead MoreCause of the Civil War1296 Words   |  6 PagesHistory 11 12/17/2006 The root causes and precipitating events that led to the Civil War (1861-1865) The Civil War between northern and southern states was a consequence of contradictions of two social systems inside the country. At the basis of these contradictions was a question of slavery, completely determining economic and political interests of South. North strived to enforce Federal government power to protect their own economic stability. As a result the South wanted a separationRead MoreCauses of the Civil War1489 Words   |  6 PagesThe Causes Of The Civil War The Political War The North and South fought over politics, mainly the idea of slavery. Basically the South wanted and needed it and the North did not want it at all. The South was going to do anything they could to keep it. This was the issue that overshadowed all others. At this time the labor force in the South had about 4 million slaves. These slaves were very valuable to the slaveholding planter class. They were a huge investment to Southerners and if taken awayRead MoreThe Causes Of Civil War2004 Words   |  9 PagesGà ¶ksel What are the causes of Civil War? Do ethnic determinants play an important role? Why are certain parts of Africa characterized by ethnic conflict while other parts remain relatively calm? The conventional understanding on the causes of civil war especially within African countries, to a considerable degree, has being predominantly characterized to draw its root on ethnic divergences. However, such premise appear extremely difficult to be true, owing to the fact that civil war is a complex action

Monday, December 16, 2019

Marvel Enterprises Free Essays

Marketing Strategy 8050 Marvel Enterprises, Inc. Case Writing by Xiaodan Dong February, 2008 Marvel Enterprises, Inc. (b) Why was Marvel’s turnaround so successful? Would you characterize that success as a fluke? Or do you view it as sustainable? Why? How? Marvel’s success is not a fluke because its business model is sustainable. We will write a custom essay sample on Marvel Enterprises or any similar topic only for you Order Now Marvel’s new strategy monetized the content library by licensing characters for use with media products. During an era in which mass media is very important in people’s life, only one media tool, publishing, is not strong enough to expand Marvel’s influence to consumers. Comic books can target a very limited market, mostly composed of male teenagers and young adults from 13 to 23 years old. It is very difficult to expand this traditional market. After many years of development, this market has matured and is very stable. Meanwhile, people have been more exposed to movies, televisions, and video games, which more effectively influence people’s consumption behavior than do comic books. All these media modes are able to reach more consumer segments than traditional comic-book publishing. Marvel’s potential to develop increased dramatically when its market expanded to broadcast media. Other consumer products, such as toys, worked in conjunction with media products, these two kinds of products reinforced each other. Marvel’s market expansion developed in both a comprehensive and intensive manner. Marvel emphasized long-term value in its new management strategy. They planed â€Å"career† for each of their characters. For example, Spider-Man’s career over the next five years is to have two more movies, DVDs, toys, a video game, and a promotion with Burger King. The intensive â€Å"career plan† extend character’s life and can have each character penetrate into people’s lives by media on a long term basis. The third main strategic dimension is to ensure the quality of the content which featured Marvel characters. Creation and consistency in characters and stories mean everything for Marvel. Before Marvel’s turnaround, the low publishing market share was mostly due to a lack of quality control. When efforts were put into improving creativity and fine artwork, the publishing business was rejuvenated and the market share increased. The publishing business provides the primary support for both licensing and toys. Marvel’s success will sustain, because the products lives are extended with well-planed â€Å"career†, and the market is expanded with thriving licensing and toy businesses. Investment in quality can enhance the product’s competitive ability in terms of both product life and market expansion. Great potential exists in each aspect of Marvel’s market. (c) How important are each of Marvel’s three divisions – Comic books, toys, and licensing – to its past and future performance? The comic book business was Marvel’s core in the past and earned almost all revenue. Comic books were so important for Marvel that its market share determined if Marvel would live or die. That is why Marvel went bankrupt in the mid-1990s, when mismanagement caused a huge drop in comic-book sales. After Marvel turned around, comic-book publishing was important as a primary business, but not a core business. Since 1997, Marvel’s financial performance in comic-book industry has been very stable and the annual sales totaled around 300 million every year. While comic book revenue should continue to be stable, its percentage will decrease in the future as Marvel’s other businesses grow. Licensing was only a small part of Marvel’s overall revenue in the past. Marvel’s licensing was mostly concentrated within the comic-book industry, selling the publishing license to some book-related businesses or some toy merchants. After Marvel took advantage of broadcast media, such as movies, television, and video games, its licensing become the largest division and collected the majority of the profit for the company. In 2003, licensing accounted for 70. 5% of the gross profit (See Appendix A Figure 1). Licensing profit had a much sharper increase from 2000 to 2003 than the other two businesses (See Appendix A Figure 2). In the future, licensing will keep increasing and its percentage of revenue will grow, especially if the management adopts a strategy of capitalizing on it. In the past, the toy business was just an annex of the publishing industry. Little effort was invested in toys which were not even mentioned strategic plans. Now the toy industry is the second-highest profit maker in Marvel, generating over $20 billion in sales in 2003. The toy business is very promising in the future. However its percentage in revenue will still remain stable or slightly decrease, just as publishing will do, because licensing has such a strong possibility for growth. In addition, while the toy industry competition is too fierce to permit further achievements. (d) To what extent is Marvel’s success due to only one character, Spider-Man? How can Marvel develop its lesser-known characters? There is no doubt that, to a great extent, Marvel’s success since the 1960s is due to Spider-Man. However, during the 1990s, the company declined despite such a successful superhero. â€Å"Exploiting† strategy by significantly increasing the number of titles stretched out consumers’ interest. Marvel’s new CEO, Peter Cuneo, restructured the company with negative assets and turned the company around. Spider-Man was resuscitated in comic-book sales. In the Publishing Division, Marvel’s 64. 7% revenue was from Spider-Man among the top famous titles in the second half year of 2003 (See Appendix A Figure 3). In the movie box office revenue, Spider-Man collected 33. 75% revenue in the US market and 37. 2% in the world market among Marvel’s eight titles movies, ranking the first (See Appendix A Figure 4). Spider-Man has gained great achievements, since the company turned around. However, Marvel’s success is not due to only one character. According to figure 3 and figure 4, other lesser-known characters, such as the X-Men and Fantastic Four, have also contributed to the company’s success. The entertainment market is difficult to predict. Consumers’ interests for media products are notoriously fickle. It could be very risky to continue to infuse resources to Spider-Man. Spreading limited resources to lesser-known characters helps the company reduce risk. Marvel needs to shift their focus to lesser-known characters which have great potential to be popular with wider public. Integrated marketing communication can be a very useful strategy to promote lesser-known characters by using prominent characters. For example, the Fantastic Four can be guests in Spider-Man’s comic-books or movies. When lesser-known characters and Spider-Man are presented to people as â€Å"Marvel’s Superheroes†, lesser-known characters can be promoted by the fame of prominent characters. As Marvel’s previous CEO Peter Cuneo (2003) said, â€Å"this is about converting Spider-Man fans into Marvel fans. † How to cite Marvel Enterprises, Papers

Sunday, December 8, 2019

Limitations of Economic Reasoning

Question: Discuss about the Limitations of Economic Reasoning. Answer: introdution: A shipbuilder entered into an agreement with a builder to build a tanker for North Ocean Tankers. The contract was in US dollars and it contained no provisions relating to currency fluctuations. While the construction of the ship was halfway, the currency value diminished its currency by 10 percent. Since the builder was making a loss in the contract, it demanded an extra 3 million dollars or else it would not proceed with the construction of the work. The buyer agreed to pay extra. However, the buyer did not commence an action to recover extra payment until nine months of delivery. Issue: Relying on the facts, the issue that shall be discussed here is, whether the buyer will success in recovering the excess or not? Relevant Rules: Consideration is an act or promise of one of the parties to the contract, to pay the price for which the promise is bought. Consideration makes a contract enforceable and is regarded as crucial for all the contracts that happen between two parties of the contract (Roberts 2014). A contract without consideration is deemed as unenforceable and void in the court of law. The doctrine of consideration is an idea of reciprocity wherein both the parties to the contract are benefitted from the contract. With the doctrine of consideration, there is an assurance that both the parties to the contract will profit from the contract and there will be a subordinate possibility that only one of the parties will take benefit from it (Fried 2015). Thus, the doctrine of consideration in contract law is regarded as a special element that should be given special care. In the landmark case of Universe Tankships Inc. of Monrovia v International Transport Workers Federation, the issue was whether the plaintiff had the authority of recovering the amount that was paid to the defendant. The defendant was giving unreasonable threat to the plaintiff that they would not release the ship if the plaintiff would not pay the reasonable amount to them (Bayern 2015). The moment when the defendant was threatening the plaintiff, the plaintiff agreed to pay the amount to the defendant, nevertheless later they filed a suit of recovery of the price in excess. The plaintiff succeeded in his claim. In the case of Senitel, a Liberian ship was black listed by the trade union. As a result of the black listing, the tug boats became inaccessible and could not sail. Consequently, it followed shocking outcome. The trade association strategized payment for their fund as a requirement that they would remove the ship from the blacklist. The owner of the Senitel agreed to pay the money then, however, later the plaintiff filed a suit for recovery and he won the case, as the money was an induced influence of economic duress (Feldman 2015). Another landmark case of Williams v Roffey Bros Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd, involved the issue of doctrine of consideration induced with economic duress. In this case, an agreement existed between sub contractor and principal contractor for doing some work related to carpentry. The original consideration of the contract was set for 20000 pounds. However, the sub contractor realized that the price of the contract was underestimated. The sub contractor threatened that if the principal contractor would not be paying to him the requisite amount he would stop working on the carpentry. The principal contractor got afraid of the penalty he may have to pay for delay in the sub contractors work. He agreed to pay the demanded price to the sub contractor. Later when the principal contractor filed a suit against the sub contractor, he won the case on the grounds that consideration was induced with economic duress and he received the price he paid in excess (Boardman 2013). Application: Likewise, in the given case study, there were chances that the North Ocean Tankers might suffer a loss if the builder denied construction of the tanker. Thus, in this case the doctrine of consideration was invoked. In the given case study, there was existence of two contracts; one was the initial contract between the shipbuilder and the tanker and the second contract was due to lack of funds for completion of the building of the tanker. Like it was discussed earlier that in the case of Universe Tankships Inc. of Monrovia v International Transport Workers Federation, Senitel and Williams v Roffey Bros Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd economic duress was involved. In the same way economic duress was also discussed in this case study as well. According to the doctrine of economic duress, a contract is considered as void if it is proven that a party entered into a contract without having sufficient options to some other recourse (McKendrick 2014). Economic duress involves an element of wrongf ul threat or an unlawful action inducing the other person to form contract. An agreement can be declared as useless if the innocent party is able to prove substantial evidence that he was induced in forming contract with the other party. The pressure should be an outcome of unlawful threat and unlawful action. The doctrine of economic duress first evolved in the case of Siboen. The Privy Council held that if any contract is made under the influence of economic duress the contract should be deemed to become void thus making the doctrine of consideration useless. However, it is an arguable matter as both the parties have the intention of creation of legal relation. This creates a binding element to the contract (Thampapillai, Tan and Bozzi 2012). Conclusion: Hence, conclusively, it may be stated that in the given case study, there was use of economic duress and there was existence of two contracts. In the first contract, the initial consideration existed while in the second contract there was existence was economic duress that made the initial contract inactive. Hence, the plaintiff may successfully recover the amount from the defendant as it involved the use of economic duress. References: Ahdar, R., 2014. Contract doctrine, predictability and the nebulous exception.The Cambridge Law Journal,73(01), pp.39-60. Bayern, S.J., 2015. The Limitations of Economic Reasoning in Analyzing Duress.Minnesota Law Review,99(141). Boardman, C.M., 2013.Considering consideration: a critical and comparative analysis of the doctrine of consideration in the Anglo-Canadian common law(Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia). Feldman, S.W., 2015. Pre-Dispute Arbitration Agreements, Freedom Of Contract, And The Economic Duress Defense: A Critique Of Three Commentaries.Clev. St. L. Rev.,64, p.37. Fried, C., 2015.Contract as promise: A theory of contractual obligation. Oxford University Press, USA. McKendrick, E., 2014.Contract law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press (UK). Roberts, M., 2014. Teat v Willcocks: Consideration and Variation Contracts Revisited.New Zealand Business Law Quarterly,20, pp.79-87. Thampapillai, D., Tan, V. and Bozzi, C., 2012.Contract law: text and cases. Oxford University Press.